How does Trendscoded handle ChatGPT vs Claude?
Trendscoded reads ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Grok as four distinct surfaces — same comparison questions, four separate answer streams — because each model retrieves and weights brand signals differently. The Trends Desk shows you what each engine names, which rivals it co-mentions, and where you sit by model.
AI assistants don't agree on rankings. ChatGPT tends to commit to a single recommendation when sources align; Claude hedges and names more rivals per answer; Gemini favors entity-rich, structured content; Grok pulls real-time signal from the X/Twitter creator and operator community. Treating them as one averaged "AI search" number throws away the signal that matters most — where your buyer is researching and which engine your category is being shaped on.
Trendscoded reads each engine on the same comparison questions you've configured. The Trends Desk surfaces per-engine deltas — if Claude starts naming a rival it didn't last week, you see that move on its own row, not buried in an average. Position Score breaks down by engine so you can answer which model you're losing on without re-cutting the data.
The Strategic AEO Plan flags which engine the gap is showing up on and what proof structure that engine rewards — long-form benchmarks for Claude, structured FAQ for ChatGPT, real-time signal for Grok. Same gap, different ship — because each model takes different evidence.
- Signal Pilot covers the model of your choice; premium-engine coverage is available as an add-on
- Position Score is per-engine — see which model your category lives on
- Trends Desk surfaces per-engine rival movements without averaging
- Strategic AEO Plan names which engine the proof should target and what structure that engine rewards
Try the pilot for a week
$500 · 24 hours · founder-configured · fixed price · no subscription. Capped at the first 15 pilots.